DUST Search - Posts by DrunkMonk 1

Result 1-20 of 41 for by author DrunkMonk 1 (0,02 seconds)

Pages: [1] 2 3
1. The "Console FPS" vs MMO characteristic of this game. - in General Discussions [original thread] sorry didnt read the entire post just a little bit i got the impresion by the title - by DrunkMonk 1 - at 2012.08.06 09:52:00
2. The "Console FPS" vs MMO characteristic of this game. - in General Discussions [original thread] Dankpancakes II wrote: This won't be lengthy, but will go over something that could really dumb down the game, and i think the community should be aware. I don't have any bias, i just observed something that has been regularly occuring on the b... - by DrunkMonk 1 - at 2012.08.06 09:17:00
3. Need a universal anti vechicle weapons - in General Discussions [original thread] Rhadiem wrote: DrunkMonk 1 wrote: Rorek IronBlood wrote: Well in all due respect this thread being seriour or not -- there are plenty of "anti" vehicle weaponry within this game already. AV Grenades Swarm Launcher Forge Gun ... - by DrunkMonk 1 - at 2012.08.06 08:22:00
4. Please DEV's fix the scout suit - in General Discussions [original thread] Dr Octagon3000 wrote: . are you trying to say point? - by DrunkMonk 1 - at 2012.08.06 08:14:00
5. Please DEV's fix the scout suit - in General Discussions [original thread] lDocHollidayl wrote: I have heard that once hit detection is fixed it will not be an issue. I am not convinced. Moving or a straight line scouts do not receive damage like other suits. Is this part of the game or an area that will be addressed?... - by DrunkMonk 1 - at 2012.08.06 08:10:00
6. Crutches and wheelchairs. - in General Discussions [original thread] Yea there are a lot of tank drivers who suck at infantry its simiply easier to be good in a tank. Hopefuly grouping and more ways to counter them come soon - by DrunkMonk 1 - at 2012.08.06 08:05:00
7. Congrats Curiosity !!! - in General Discussions [original thread] Rhadiem wrote: Congrats The Future. Now where's my flying car? coming in the next build nasa confirmed - by DrunkMonk 1 - at 2012.08.06 07:43:00
8. why weren't stasis nades included in this patch - in General Discussions [original thread] xprotoman23 wrote: They are clearly listed in the patch notes. I don't want an EVE player or a fanboy trying to rationalize as to why they aren't here when they were listed in the E3 builds patch notes. what would stasis grenades do? - by DrunkMonk 1 - at 2012.08.06 03:57:00
9. Need a universal anti vechicle weapons - in General Discussions [original thread] Rorek IronBlood wrote: Well in all due respect this thread being seriour or not -- there are plenty of "anti" vehicle weaponry within this game already. AV Grenades Swarm Launcher Forge Gun I'm not particulary sure if RE's (Re... - by DrunkMonk 1 - at 2012.08.06 02:16:00
10. Need a universal anti vechicle weapons - in General Discussions [original thread] Maken Tosch wrote: DrunkMonk 1 wrote: Zander Rodriguez wrote: Then whats the point of spending money and time grinding up to a sagaris if you can automatically kill it off the bat? I didnt say they should be able to do it easily Ye... - by DrunkMonk 1 - at 2012.08.06 02:13:00
11. Need a universal anti vechicle weapons - in General Discussions [original thread] Debacle Nano wrote: What? That makes no sense. The basic gear hardly damages a proto tank - by DrunkMonk 1 - at 2012.08.06 02:07:00
12. Need a universal anti vechicle weapons - in General Discussions [original thread] Zander Rodriguez wrote: DrunkMonk 1 wrote: Zander Rodriguez wrote: Then whats the point of spending money and time grinding up to a sagaris if you can automatically kill it off the bat? I didnt say they should be able to do it easily ... - by DrunkMonk 1 - at 2012.08.06 02:05:00
13. Need a universal anti vechicle weapons - in General Discussions [original thread] Debacle Nano wrote: And yet you said this. Quote: a new player can kill one No I said damage read op - by DrunkMonk 1 - at 2012.08.06 02:03:00
14. Need a universal anti vechicle weapons - in General Discussions [original thread] Debacle Nano wrote: Yea I do think he is trolling. Can't even answer my question. because most player still wont be able to kill it if your skilled - by DrunkMonk 1 - at 2012.08.06 02:01:00
15. Need a universal anti vechicle weapons - in General Discussions [original thread] [/quote]Hey bud, I am a tank driver and I dislike this idea.. You should be quoting him not me.[/quote] this is true - by DrunkMonk 1 - at 2012.08.06 02:01:00
16. Need a universal anti vechicle weapons - in General Discussions [original thread] Debacle Nano wrote: DrunkMonk 1 wrote: Zander Rodriguez wrote: Then whats the point of spending money and time grinding up to a sagaris if you can automatically kill it off the bat? The point to earning a sagaris is to have a better tan... - by DrunkMonk 1 - at 2012.08.06 01:57:00
17. Need a universal anti vechicle weapons - in General Discussions [original thread] Zander Rodriguez wrote: Then whats the point of spending money and time grinding up to a sagaris if you can automatically kill it off the bat? The point to earning a sagaris is to have a better tank, just because a new player can kill one if ... - by DrunkMonk 1 - at 2012.08.06 01:52:00
18. Need a universal anti vechicle weapons - in General Discussions [original thread] Zander Rodriguez wrote: Then whats the point of spending money and time grinding up to a sagaris if you can automatically kill it off the bat? I didnt say they should be able to do it easily - by DrunkMonk 1 - at 2012.08.06 01:49:00
19. Need a universal anti vechicle weapons - in General Discussions [original thread] Every player should be able to access anti-vehicle weapons powerful enough to damage a Sagaris right of the bat . As it stands one person in a sagaris can play whole match without dying simply because no one on the other team has any sp invested i... - by DrunkMonk 1 - at 2012.08.06 01:42:00
20. we really need more players. - in General Discussions [original thread] well the most people who play this game quit after the first few games. - by DrunkMonk 1 - at 2012.08.06 01:31:00
Pages: [1] 2 3
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

An Error Occured

Arguments are of the wrong type, are out of acceptable range, or are in conflict with one another.

The Error has been logged and will be further investigated shortly.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.